Compare

Nohmo vs Aptabase

Aptabase measures the app. Nohmo watches it fall over too.

Aptabase is a genuinely nice piece of work: open source, privacy-first, self-hostable, and built specifically for apps rather than retrofitted from web analytics. If you want simple app analytics you can host yourself, it is a strong choice.

Nohmo overlaps on app analytics and then keeps going — native crash capture, crash-free rate per release, rage-tap detection and install attribution.

Nohmo vs Aptabase, feature by feature

Feature comparison: Nohmo versus Aptabase
CapabilitynohmoAptabase
Open source
Partial
Included
Self-hosting
Not included
Included
App-first design
Included
Included
Native crash capture
Included
Not included
Crash-free rate per release
Included
Not included
Rage-tap / silent failure detection
Included
Not included
Install attribution
Included
Not included
Funnels and journeys
Included
Partial
IncludedPartial / add-onNot included

Which one should you pick?

Choose Aptabase if…

  • Open source and self-hosting matter more than breadth.
  • You want the simplest possible app analytics with a clear privacy story.
  • Budget is the deciding factor.

Choose Nohmo if…

  • You want crash monitoring and analytics from the same SDK.
  • You need release health — is this build worse than the last one.
  • You care about install attribution and silent failures.

Where Nohmo falls short today

  • Aptabase is open source and self-hostable. Nohmo is neither.
  • It is cheaper, and simpler if simplicity is what you want.
  • Its privacy positioning is stronger than ours.

Why teams choose Nohmo

Crashes and analytics together

Native handlers on both platforms, with crash-free rate compared against the previous build.

Funnels and journeys

Follow a user through a flow and see the step that loses them, not only which events fired.

Attribution included

Deterministic install attribution from the Play install referrer and UTM-tagged links.

Frequently asked questions

Do they overlap much?+

On core app analytics, yes. The difference is crashes, release health, attribution and friction detection, none of which Aptabase covers.

Can I self-host Nohmo?+

No. If that is a requirement, Aptabase is the better answer.

The verdict

Aptabase is a fine choice for simple, open-source app analytics. Nohmo is the pick when you want crashes, release health and friction in the same SDK.

Switch from Aptabase in an afternoon

One npm package, one provider, and you are tracking analytics and errors — cookielessly.

No credit card required · $49/mo during early access (normally $79)

Comparison reflects our understanding of Aptabase as of 2026; third-party products change — check their site for current details.